
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appointed vs. elected: You can’t have it both ways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.centergroveinc.org/2009/06/08/appointed-vs-elected/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.centergroveinc.org/2009/06/08/appointed-vs-elected/</link>
	<description>Following the future of White River Township</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:10:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Raber</title>
		<link>http://www.centergroveinc.org/2009/06/08/appointed-vs-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Raber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centergroveinc.org/?p=1721#comment-810</guid>
		<description>Hiring more people costs more money. We need to keep it small and Incorporate so we can decide the size of OUR Government.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiring more people costs more money. We need to keep it small and Incorporate so we can decide the size of OUR Government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Klinger</title>
		<link>http://www.centergroveinc.org/2009/06/08/appointed-vs-elected/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Klinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 21:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.centergroveinc.org/?p=1721#comment-808</guid>
		<description>What about a hybrid system that includes a mayor and a city manager?  Many existing communities have this type of structure.  Was it even considered here?  Was any research done? 

Under this scenario, the City Council still holds the purse strings and approves the budget, the Mayor establishes the policies and priorities for city governance, but the full time management and day to day business operations of city adminisration would be left to a professional city manager with a degree in public management.  You still have the political accountability that comes with an elected Mayor who is setting political priorities for the administration, but also benefit from the professionalism that comes with a city manager. The problem that is often associated with elected Mayors is that political acumen does not always translate into being a good administrator.  The reality is that 80-90% of what a city does on a day-to-day basis does not change with a new Mayor.  The new Mayor may provide a new direction on a few things, but if the Mayor is not a good administrator other services can seriously suffer. A change in administration under a traditional elected Mayor model can result in a huge loss of institutional knowledge as key political appointees flee the city administration with the out-going mayor. A professional city manager, if instituted properly, should be able to survive changes in the political scene and provide stability in a professionally adimistered city and leadership in implementing the policy priorities established by the elected Mayor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a hybrid system that includes a mayor and a city manager?  Many existing communities have this type of structure.  Was it even considered here?  Was any research done? </p>
<p>Under this scenario, the City Council still holds the purse strings and approves the budget, the Mayor establishes the policies and priorities for city governance, but the full time management and day to day business operations of city adminisration would be left to a professional city manager with a degree in public management.  You still have the political accountability that comes with an elected Mayor who is setting political priorities for the administration, but also benefit from the professionalism that comes with a city manager. The problem that is often associated with elected Mayors is that political acumen does not always translate into being a good administrator.  The reality is that 80-90% of what a city does on a day-to-day basis does not change with a new Mayor.  The new Mayor may provide a new direction on a few things, but if the Mayor is not a good administrator other services can seriously suffer. A change in administration under a traditional elected Mayor model can result in a huge loss of institutional knowledge as key political appointees flee the city administration with the out-going mayor. A professional city manager, if instituted properly, should be able to survive changes in the political scene and provide stability in a professionally adimistered city and leadership in implementing the policy priorities established by the elected Mayor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

