Comments on: Cost saving examples we must explore http://www.centergroveinc.org/2009/08/22/cost-saving-examples-we-must-explore/ Following the future of White River Township Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:10:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dann http://www.centergroveinc.org/2009/08/22/cost-saving-examples-we-must-explore/comment-page-1/#comment-895 Dann Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:29:42 +0000 http://www.centergroveinc.org/?p=2200#comment-895 The difference is are they exploring fundamentally new way to organize government and promote efficiencies or simply counting fire hydrants? Are they "merging" Center Grove with Greenwood...meaning just expanding Greenwood to serve more people or are they "reorganizing" and finding ways to deliver services at lower cost for all citizens. Our concern is that they are simply looking at ways to expand the current structure when the intent of the enabling legislation is to change the way government services are provided. Dann The difference is are they exploring fundamentally new way to organize government and promote efficiencies or simply counting fire hydrants? Are they “merging” Center Grove with Greenwood…meaning just expanding Greenwood to serve more people or are they “reorganizing” and finding ways to deliver services at lower cost for all citizens.

Our concern is that they are simply looking at ways to expand the current structure when the intent of the enabling legislation is to change the way government services are provided.

Dann

]]> By: Scott Wilson http://www.centergroveinc.org/2009/08/22/cost-saving-examples-we-must-explore/comment-page-1/#comment-894 Scott Wilson Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:55:43 +0000 http://www.centergroveinc.org/?p=2200#comment-894 I don't understand... in one story, the reorganization committee must "STOP" with the detail and in this one they have to dig deeper into public private partnerships so a contract employ can peel off a magnet and go "off the clock" saving a whopping $2.00 in the process? Which it it? "Enough already" or "not explored this option deeply"??? I don’t understand… in one story, the reorganization committee must “STOP” with the detail and in this one they have to dig deeper into public private partnerships so a contract employ can peel off a magnet and go “off the clock” saving a whopping $2.00 in the process?

Which it it? “Enough already” or “not explored this option deeply”???

]]>