Set the “Wayback Machine” to 1989

by: Dann Veldkamp Sunday, September 6th, 2009

It’s trite, but if I had a quarter for every time I’ve heard someone say White River Township should have incorporated 20 years ago, I’d finally be in a house with a three-car garage! Everyone seems to want to dwell on “what should have been done.” Well, if there is one thing that I’ve learned in my 15 years as a project manager is that you can not complete a task “last week,” you can only complete tasks either today or in the future. But, when it comes to gaining many of the benefits of incorporation, we may be able to jump in the “Wayback Machine” and gain many of the benefits of incorporating earlier.

"Is there an 1989 setting?"

"Is there an 1989 setting?"

One of the primary laments is how Greenwood has “stolen” all the good commercial property along 135. Citizens of Center Grove and Smith Valley gain no benefit from the property tax dollars levied against LA Fitness, Meijer, Taco Bell, McDonalds, Mendards, Target or any of the other businesses along this important piece of road. Why? Because they reside within the city limits of Greenwood. Why? Because in many cases they asked to be incorporated. Yes, they requested incorporation into Greenwood. If there is anything that business hate is it uncertainty. Constructing a major business in an unincorporated area such as White River Township leaves too many things to chance. They don’t know when the laws will change or who will change them. If they reside in a city, there is a greater chance that the business environment will be more stable. This allows them to plan and planning improves profits.

So, how do we get into the Wayback Machine, experience 1989 all over again, and gain the tax revenues from these businesses? Reorganize with the city of Greenwood. Before you say “I will never…,” think about it. We would then be part of a new city that is collecting the property taxes from this business. We would have representation on the City Council and the boards that decide how this money is spent. Sure, we would not be able to keep all the money in Center Grove and Smith Valley, it would have to be shared with the rest of the city, but a half-a-loaf is better than none!

I agree. We should have incorporated 20 years ago, but we didn’t and we can’t really go back and do it. So, perhaps we need to settle for the next best thing: Gain at least part of the revenue back through reorganization. As you consider how you might vote in the election scheduled for May of next year, keep the “Wayback Machine” in mind.

No related posts.

« | Home | »

3 Responses to “Set the “Wayback Machine” to 1989”

Sadim Murphy Said:

When did you get converted and what price were you paid? Why the shift in thinking? So far, from what has been reported here and in the Daily Journal, Greenwood seems to be getting the better end of this deal, at least in the near term. What the “reorganization” effort has offered Center Grove is the potential for additional parks, and keeping monies in the area for road repairs (but we haven’t seen the accounting rules for that yet).

We’ve seen what’s in it for Greenwood — guaranteed additional dollars, additional TIF districts that will negatively affect WRT tax rates for schools and other funds, second class city status that the mayor has wanted for years, and access to lots of development potential.

Yes, think what this area will be in 20-30 years. Look east, and see unfinished developments, neighborhoods with collapsing infrastructure (roads, storm & sanitary sewers). More disjointed development — see 135 and east of I-65 for that.

No, Jody, I don’t think Greenwood is the best answer. So far, Pat Sherman (aka Charlie Henderson’s henchman) has demonstrated that he will negotiate with WRT only when it threatens potential development (see SW portion of twnship) and is a sore loser when he doesn’t get his way. Maybe when this “reorganization” fails, can the citizens of WRT approach Bargersville and strike a better deal. Greenwood is hardly our only option.

Comment made on September 6th, 2009 at 10:24 pm
Dann Said:

It’s clear that you’ve been following this very closely. In fact, I think all of your comments are valid to one degree or another. The question is: What truly are our options? People failed to come together (so far) around self-incorporation. I’ve personally talked with various officials in Bargersville and if they don’t have sewers in a given area, they are not interested in making that area part of Bargersville, so that leaves out much of WRT. I am very interested in any other options you may have in mind.

I can assure you that we have not “converted” and as long as we are getting people to think, as you obviously are, we are happy. As we’ve said many times, our goal is that the entire township be incorporated. While we have our personal preferences (such as self-incorporation even five years ago) right now we have a somewhat limited set of options and we have to work within those options. Until we see the plan, there is really nothing to endorse or reject.

Thanks for your comments and keep them coming.

Regards,
Dann

Comment made on September 8th, 2009 at 8:49 am
Dann Said:

A Chinese proverb says, “The best time to plant a tree is twenty years ago; the second best time is today.”

Comment made on October 2nd, 2009 at 3:28 pm
 

Leave a Comment