Comments on: Messick responds to Marks http://www.centergroveinc.org/2010/05/02/messick_responds/ Following the future of White River Township Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:10:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Dann http://www.centergroveinc.org/2010/05/02/messick_responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1453 Dann Wed, 05 May 2010 16:13:58 +0000 http://www.centergroveinc.org/?p=3938#comment-1453 Sadim asks: "Can’t the WRT Board simply reject the proposal now?" Short answer is no. As you can see in Jody's post, failure to act means it goes into effect within a year. The only way to kill the proposal is for the citizens to vote it down. And given that I haven't heard one person who supports the proposal, I think it's safe to predict it will die at the ballot box. Sadim asks: “Can’t the WRT Board simply reject the proposal now?”

Short answer is no. As you can see in Jody’s post, failure to act means it goes into effect within a year. The only way to kill the proposal is for the citizens to vote it down. And given that I haven’t heard one person who supports the proposal, I think it’s safe to predict it will die at the ballot box.

]]> By: Joe http://www.centergroveinc.org/2010/05/02/messick_responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1451 Joe Wed, 05 May 2010 02:17:27 +0000 http://www.centergroveinc.org/?p=3938#comment-1451 Unless Greenwood is willing to start all over and come up with a smart, fiscally responsible merged government with proper representation (yeah right), put it on the ballot and let it be voted into oblivion. Especially with the "one year with no action means it goes into effect" provision. Unless Greenwood is willing to start all over and come up with a smart, fiscally responsible merged government with proper representation (yeah right), put it on the ballot and let it be voted into oblivion.

Especially with the “one year with no action means it goes into effect” provision.

]]> By: sadim Murphy http://www.centergroveinc.org/2010/05/02/messick_responds/comment-page-1/#comment-1449 sadim Murphy Wed, 05 May 2010 02:06:35 +0000 http://www.centergroveinc.org/?p=3938#comment-1449 Can't the WRT Board simply reject the proposal now? Especially if the reorg committee comes back with changes that one body (Greenwood) approves? Then we wouldn't have matching resolutions, which is required. Hmmm... Can’t the WRT Board simply reject the proposal now? Especially if the reorg committee comes back with changes that one body (Greenwood) approves? Then we wouldn’t have matching resolutions, which is required. Hmmm…

]]>