CG Referendum fails, Messick prevails
If you based it on yard signs and chatter the Center Grove School Referendum should have received voter approval, by at least a slim margin. But the votes turned our differntly with 6,196 votes to 8,372 voting no sending the measure to defeat by a 57 to 43 percent margin.
In the school board election Scott Alexander, Jack L. Russell, and Susan Mullendore, finished one, two, three for the three available seats. Coming in fourth and fifth were Lynda M. Parziale and Tom Heermann. With the referendum failing the challenge for the new board will be to trim spending without laying off teachers or diminishing quality of education in the district.
In the other race of interest in the township, the current township board chair, Mark Messick faced Independent challenger Ken Baker. That race ended with Messkick, the Republican, winning 71% of the vote. Baker ran a spirited camapign that brought the Trustee’s race to the November election instead of ending, as usual, with the Republican primary in May.
Related posts (Automatically generated):




44 Responses to “CG Referendum fails, Messick prevails”
This failed for many reasons which will soon be clear. This is a message to the school admin, existing school board and new members. We do not trust you to spend the money wisely.
Comment made on November 2nd, 2010 at 9:36 pmThere are so many wiser budget cut option that can be made without laying off teachers or programs. So many people are worried about music being cut but they tried to do that last year and the residents won’t let that happen.
Comment made on November 2nd, 2010 at 9:57 pmAlyssa, exactly. The real question is will we do the cuts such as STEP increases, matching contributions to retirements and making admin personnel pay the same for insurance as teachers.
Comment made on November 2nd, 2010 at 10:38 pmThis referendum failed and now the school board and administration will need to review the budget without prejudice. The days of ivory towers, sacred cows, and boondogles are no longer.
What also needs to occur within this budget process is accurate numbers from the school corporation. The district has publicly given out 3 different numbers for 1 job position (February 2010, March 2010, and October 2010) and the range for this position is between $ 54k and $ 114K. I guess that they don’t realize that some citizens actually keep the information that they distribute and then notice when numbers don’t match.
I think that it is time to put the Chief Financial Officer on notice that numbers need to match. If that type of accountability and transparency are not a requirement of the corporation’s CFO, then it needs to be added to the job duties of that position effective immediately.
Comment made on November 2nd, 2010 at 10:47 pmCenter Grove: A lower educated, lower class, lower skilled version of Carmel and Fishers.
No wonder we have so few National Merit Semifinalists compared to Carmel.
As a former CG student, I’ll be raising my children in Hamilton County.
It’s pretty simple, Center Grovers: when investments in education go down… crime rates go up, home values go down & new residents choose Avon, Carmel, or Zionsville instead.
CG is more like Martinsville and Franklin than I thought.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 5:28 amNow is the time for educators to make a decision to educate and not propogate there liberal agenda.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 8:15 amCenter Grove schools need to except reality that we all have to cut back, alter our lavish life style and get back to the basics, in this case education. The baggage attached to those state and Federal dollars are many and now is the time for someone to say the “BUCK STOP HERE”. Free public education is a misnomer and now the people have spoken. Now the superintedent and the school board can get down to the real business of the people and make the hard choices and do more with less that is what is going on in the real world and the days of the $25,000 rubber stamp machine running during board meetings need to come to and end. Thanks to the voters who voted their conscience and not their fervor whipped and threatened emotion.
The CG administration has done it again, much like the building project. Strong armed, intimidating,we know best attitude has failed again. Serious decisions must be made about personnel. Now is the time to look at making cuts; administrators who are continually on the wrong side of issues should be gone. People that spend money without regard to the overall situation must be dealt with. The atheletic department spent hundreds of thousands of dollars with no direct benefit to the athletes. The police department destroys community relations and exposes the Corporation to extreme liability. Everyone please stay involved; help this board succeed in the most difficult of times. Teachers need not be the first sacrifices.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 8:51 amYes you all can pat yourselves on the back today..good for you…now we can cut all the administrators in the corporation, coaches, support staff, Police Officers and then we can save the ALL the 44 teachers that will have to be cut for next school year. Then the teachers can answer the phones, protect the students, run the financials, deal with the public, handle HR issues, do all the DOE reporting, handle all the technology for the district (which it will be back to pencils and paper only if it comes to that), Handle all management of custodians, bus drivers, maintenance workers and handle all the discipline. Yes that is the solution…great job guys…you have solved all the problems and really cut the fat haven’t you.
Even getting Harry Potter elected to the school board isn’t going to save all the Teachers…sorry guys!
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 9:52 amNicole:
The message sent was very simple: WRT residents don’t trust CG administrators with more of their money. I can only hope the new school board members pick up on this message and make some changes.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 10:17 amCG Adminstrators have NOTHING to do with the cuts the State made to the General Fund. It’s just sad that the “message” couldn’t have been “sent” another way that doesn’t effect students and teachers.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 10:25 amAdministrators have EVERYTHING to do with being unable to convince the public that they’re good stewards of taxpayer money and they’ve done EVERYTHING they could before they came to the taxpayers asking for more money.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 10:48 amNicole,
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 10:50 amI you are incorrect. Their are cuts and cutbacks that will not impact the number of teachers in the classroom. Also blame your board and admin for passing the $3.8 million bond issue in Sept that had almost $1.8 million in unneeded items. I do not know about you but I would rather have teachers in the classroom than laptops! You seem to not live in the reality of running a school system on what is needed versus wants. Also the police are not needed, however if you want to pay for them out of your pocket by all means write the check. I would rather fire an officer than a teacher any day of the week. I would rather let a secretary or admin go than a teacher any day of the week. I believe you must work for the school system in the admin/offices by the way you protect their poor decision making. Also they better raise enough money to pay back to the General Fund the $15,000 they blew on the Referendum PAC or all hell will break loose!
Community members and businesses have been donating to the referendum fund…and for those who voted no they are the ones who “blew” the money…all the hours of VOLUNTEERS who believe in their school system – security and all. You can say all you want about staff wearing t-shirts to support the referendum…but allot of that same staff took hours AFTER WORK to try to get this passed. Our interim Superintendant spent hours late at night calling residents for this cause…which I don’t believe is part of his contract.
Laptops bought with a bond..has no effect on the tax rate…stays the same because we cash out bonds once a year every year to purchase equipment for the schools…just so happens..this year it was used to buy laptops….can’t use a bond to pay for salaries…we paid off one and purchased another.
You voted…you won…congradulations…now we have to choose between the security of our students and teachers…if it would have passed there wouldn’t be these tough decisions…but way to go…go for you.
I assume you don’t talk to many teachers who appreciate our police officers and special programs that will now have to be eliminated.
PS….I am a resident and have children in the school corporation…I also have family members that work for the schools.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 11:06 amI voted NO and I am so glad I did. I am a parent that believes education is one of the most important gifts I can give my children. Sacrifices need to be made for quality education in the schools and home, we need to invest more time not money in our children’s educations. Cuts should start with overpaid traffic directors aka cgpd and continue with cutting out other luxuries not necessities. What is wrong with doing homework with a pencil and paper? Perception is the problem here in center grove in a feeling of entitlement rather than necessity.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 11:45 amCenter Grove will continue to provide a great education to our children just at a more affordable price. This will be achieved by the passion of the great teachers in the classrooms with our children. I make sacrifices as a parent and will make continue to make those sacrifices as I send my children to private schools where their are no police directing traffic flows but parents and teachers out there watching over our children. Make an investment in your own children with time not money.
Nicole,
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 11:46 amOur family donates both money and time to the school along with having multiple children in the system. However I have reasonable expectations that a school system conducts fiscal responsibility. It is you and the volunteers for the referendum who blew the money, which should have never come out of the fund that pays teachers. It was your group who never understood that the public was not going to approve the overage amount you factored in the referendum of about $1.8million. It was you and the volunteers who do not understand limits on spending. Also the fact is we are taxed for the laptops. Just because it replaces debt that is being retired means nothing. It is a bond that is on our property taxes. You people seem to not understand common financial terms nor finances. Perhaps that is another reason our school is in poor financial shape. Perhaps the teachers should have taken no STEP pay increases last year or this year. Perhaps all employees of Center Grove a minor pay cut like the private industry has. Also our consultant interim Super is well paid on top of his living expenses and transport.
Don’t let me hear that Dr. Lippe working extra hours. Steve Hefley worked 12 hours a day for the last 40 days straight and his birthday for not a penny of pay. Paid for all advertised experience from his own pocket.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 11:55 amKeep arguing to make yourself feel right. Your argueing in circles doesn’t change the fact that STATE cut funds. Volunteers believe in a quality education, which includes technology and security.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 12:09 pmNicole; who do you refer to as Harry Potter?
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 12:11 pmRich; they spent about $30,000 to support the referendum. They can do it without cutting teachers; but examples I heard during the campaign of having P.E. teachers with only 10-12 students in a class certainly could use some consolidation. It will take a long time for the fear tactics of the admin to wear off. That was no way to win people to your side. Common sense, people.
I say “shame on you” to those who have students in the school system that voted NO for the referendum. How can you vote against keeping teachers in your particular building and classroom sizes down? Do I think that there were/are additional cuts that could/can be made – yes. Do I think that some of the current board members only had a seat for their own agenda – absolutely and shame on them. As a community we have got to come together, prepare to move forward and stop harping on issues from the past.
Rich, you seem to have all the answers, or should I say opionions, for most of everything wrong with CG. Why didn’t you run for school board? Oh, I think you did two-years ago and lost…
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 12:18 pmWilliam,
William,
I wasn’t referring to anyone as Harry Potter..I am just saying you can’t make money where there isn’t..
You want to consolidate…make larger classrooms…you guys got it… congratulations…
Not fear tactics…truth tactics…see CG thought people cared about quality education and their community…but apparently not. Let’s teach the administration a lesson…or is it our kids the lesson is being taught…we care more about other things than education…because I believe that is the lesson of the day.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 12:21 pmNicole:
The lesson is that you can’t expect to scare people into giving you more money (even if you really need it this time) after years of asking for more when you really didn’t need it and abusing the trust of the citizens.
I know that story as “The Boy Who Cried Wolf”. I suspect most students know that lesson already, and they should learn it’s applicable to this situation.
Don’t blame the voters, blame the administration. They did not make the case to the general public in terms that could win passage of the referendum.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 1:10 pmNo I actually blame all the lies, rumors, and beating of dead horses…example astro turf, astronmical salary figures communicated to the public.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 1:27 pmNicole: If the case they had was undone by “lies on fliers” paid for by individual citizens, then they did a very poor job of making the case a property tax increase was needed.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 1:40 pmTammy,
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 2:57 pmYes, I did run and at least I can say I tried to head the problem off, can you. At least I did not quit like some people and still tried to fix the problems we are in. I am also the only one who told everyone about the economic trouble coming at the school, almost 3 years ago. The school was going to have a shortfall before the state changed the budget law. This was due to poor cost controls. I cannot help it that all my years running a successful business prepared me to read a budget and analyze cost cutting. I also told the supporters of the ref that it would fail, yet you said it wouldn’t. Oh, Tammy you think this current and past board did a good job? LOL. They have made poor purchasing decisions, projects and hiring decisions throught. Also it seems people like you want the community to have amnesia on the wrongs of the past even as early as September’s bond issuance and the poorly designed referendum of only yesterday.
Tammy, the NO’s are concerned parents and community members who are sick of poor management of our schools. People like you need to realize that the NO’s have the power. Until you actually compromise on this issue of cuts, you will fail. That is your decision and the consequences are yours.
I am a former CG student and received a high quality education from all of the Center Grove school I attended. My brother is now attending CGHS and from being in the system and involved in the school I know there are so many cuts that could be made without cutting programs or teachers. Just because the referendum didn’t pass doesn’t mean that school will not become a failing one or the quality of education will be decreased. Yes, there are bigger classroom sizes because the Center Grove area is growing and sometimes I had 30+ kids in a class but I still received hand on attention from my teachers and achieved academic success. There are plenty of other schools with smaller budgets than CG to begin with yet they are still producing college graduates. The school board and CG needs to cut wasteful spending, trim a few edges, and focus on the things that are most important to learning while reevaluating the budget. Simple changes like “pay to play” would be a good start and would not decrease the amount of participation because CG is already such a strong athletic school in which people move to the area to play at.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 3:03 pmI have children in CG schools. The school board and the administration are both to blame for this failure. They lost the trust of the citizens.
Maybe if it was a 2 year referendum that we could revisit in 2012 I would have approved it. But 7 years, a lot can happen in 7 years. And what happens at the end of 7 years and the “extra” from the referendum is considered “bare minimum”? Another larger referendum? It will become like the bonds, retire one and immediately replace it, that way the homeowners wont realize how much they’re being taxed.
Administration get lavish incentives, and do not see them as lavish.
Teachers harassed students about getting parents to support the referendum. This puts the students in a difficult place, they often don’t know family finances and are torn between what the school tells them is in their best interest and what their parents try to explain.
The skyward system was used to politic in favor of the referendum. This system was to be used so that I could see my children’s grades and homework. Not to know that I can get a discount and support the CG referendum while buying jewelery or take-out food.
It is unfortunate that monies were “borrowed” from the same fund that we were being told was running low. Did no one ever consider that this would not pass?
The sky wont fall, kids won’t fail. Belts will be tightened and we’ll go on.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 3:06 pmTim,
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 3:50 pmWell said. I was irritated that the teacher during one of my childrens parent teacher conferences asked if I heard about the referendum and handed me literature along with our childs report. I am their for my childs progress report not a sales pitch on a political agenda. My child should be the focus of our time not some referendum.
Rich,
You keep mentioning that teachers should not receive salary step increases. Although you may have some background in finance, you clearly have no idea what it’s like to be a teacher. As a fourth year teacher, I depend on, and desperately need, my salary step increases. I earn $36,000 per year before taxes, while another teacher down the hall does the same job and earns $56,000. Are you suggesting that my salary should be frozen and I should earn less than my peers? As I work tirelessly to support my students day in and day out, I can’t help but wonder if I should have started my career in another area where citizens actually value education, and are willing to support their schools.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 4:33 pmTim, the teachers did not “harass” students about getting parents support. They simply were informing us about the referendum. Our teachers never took time out of learning to “harass” us about the referendum, if they did inform us, it was during our STaR period, so don’t accuse the teachers of harassing students.
Rich, you seem to keep bashing the actions of the school corporation instead of giving solutions the school could take. Like Tammy said, if you have so much knowledge about what it happening around the corporation, why didn’t you run for school board this year. You have no room to talk and bash the school board when you clearly have not done anything to help out such as running for school board.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 4:34 pmcghs, i can point out their mistakes because i pay alot in property taxes, do you?. I am also a voter. Also you seem to have not read my posts on where they made mistakes and things they could do to save money. I also pointed out about them not doing a inter transfer between the CPF fund and the General Fund as allowed by law this year. I will give you the benefit of the doubt that you have not read the posts that I have on this website nor my article there also. Also the school board was given recommendations 2 years ago that they did not act on. Whose fault is that, theres that is who.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 6:50 pmRich already did:
http://www.centergroveinc.org/2010/10/21/know-the-facts-before-referendum-vote/
There’s more somewhere in a comment that was never refuted, either.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 6:56 pmCenter Grove: A lower educated, lower class, lower skilled version of Carmel and Fishers.
No wonder we have so few National Merit Semifinalists compared to Carmel.
As a former CG student, I’ll be raising my children in Hamilton County.
It’s pretty simple, Center Grovers: when investments in education go down… crime rates go up, home values go down & new residents choose Avon, Carmel, or Zionsville instead.
CG is more like Martinsville and Franklin than I thought.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 7:22 pmCoach Dice wrote excuse slips for students to miss 1st and 2nd period classes to hold CG yes referendum signs outside the polls at CG elementary school.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 7:24 pmNumber one thing that needs to happen is to form unity. Administrators must may the same $550. a month HEALTH CARE cost as the teachers. form unity. Equal as the teachers (not one dollar, not $150 a month, not $350 a month) $550 a month, same as the teachers. Nothing less should be accepted.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 7:35 pmRegarding Andy’s post: How incredibly insulting. It’s probably best for all of us if your children are educated in another county. They’re going to be really arrogant, and my daughter doesn’t need that kind of influence.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 7:35 pmYes, a higher tax rate leads to smarter kids. It’s all so simple. We want stupid kids because we dare refuse to give the school district a blank check.
Right. Solid logic there.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 7:42 pmJoe, agreed.
Who’s to say that the extra money in the “general fund” would go directly to teachers anyway? As far as I know the “general fund” goes to a lot more than just teachers. Every year no matter what the financial standings, the schools always say they don’t have enough money to pay teachers. Seems we need to get our priorities straight.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 7:58 pm1,587 votes for a school board candidate that was removed from the race weeks before the election.
If they weren’t informed enough to know a candidate was no longer in the running, I’m curious to know how they voted on the referendum.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 8:04 pmAs I read these comments, I am amazed at the arrogance and the stance of entitlement expressed by supporters of the referendum in regards to teachers and administrators. To the arrogant administration and teachers I say, you just don’t get it, it is about the education of students stupid! All you seem to be concerned about are the teachers well being and unbridled spending without accountability. It’s the tax payers money, not yours, and you are accountable to the tax payers to be effective with the money. History shows that you can not be trusted to spend tax payers money. As an example of the arrogance of the school administration, when I asked principle
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 10:00 pmShockly in a referendum meeting why they were asking for 3.1 million per year when they only need $300,000, his reply was that they could have asked for more then the 3.1 million. I did need to here any more to be convinced that a message had to be sent to the CG school administration that the tax payers are not stupid and the days of unbridled spending are over. Based on the vote, it looks like the majority of tax payers feel the same….IT IS ABOUT THE EDUCATION OF OUR CHILDREN STUPID. Not CG administration perceived entitlement.
Andy, I believe the real issue isn’t the tax increase but the attitude that administrators showed toward the community.
They should have called it ‘The Ultimatum’ as it would have been a more accurate description. Let me ask you this, what kind of leadership would threaten to risk 10 teaching positions above making other decreases that are more flexible? I will give full acknowledgement to how hard it must have been to close West Grove – that was a really tough call to make, but it was a smart one.
The way I see it, CG admin placed 10 positions on the chopping block in order to get the FIRST
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 10:15 pm…phase of increases it desired. The next up, was widely believed to be building expansions.
Just think of the math – if we voted no, they threated 10 positions cut, but if we voted yes, they would add 3…
Really??? Cmon now – I find that to be a lack of real transparency and leadership on the part of administrators.
Comment made on November 3rd, 2010 at 10:18 pmDear CGTeach.
Comment made on November 4th, 2010 at 10:23 amAll I can say is you chose your career no one made you pick it. The fact is that all jobs are taking pay freezes and cuts. This is an economic reality. There is no state nor school system in our country that is doing some of these same things. You always have the right to try and get a job in another system, however we will have 20+ applicants for every opening at CG. I have to ask you would you rather not get a STEP increase or be let go? In the end it is about living in the reality of the world. A teacher is an employee also not a protected class.
CGTeach, one more thing it is not us who control that a teacher with more service time gets paid more. The fact is your union dictates tenure as the controlling factor on pay and who is let go no matter what their job performance is. Perhaps you should take this up with your union who is artificially promoting time served over teacher performance in the classroom.
Comment made on November 4th, 2010 at 10:29 amJust to clarify…the 3 million asked for was based on the assumption the state had told the schools to be prepared for future cuts…which would result in the loss of up to 44 teachers if more cuts are made to the state budget this spring…no one knows if this will happen but it could and if we only asked for the 1 million and more cuts are made then that means less money to the general fund to pay teachers. The school was trying to be proactive to not have to make these cuts. So don’t be surprised when the ball drops next fall…
Comment made on November 4th, 2010 at 10:39 amLeave a Comment